Home Blog Post 02/12/22 - Math League #5 Write-ups
Post
Cancel

Blog Post 02/12/22 - Math League #5 Write-ups

Math League #5

Some problems from the Wisconsin Math Leauge. I scored 6/6! :D Riju and I agreed that it was probably the easiest one so far this year, though the last one still requires some thinking. I waited 24 hours to post this, and I hope that is a good grace period for the problems.

Problem 3 What $n \in \mathbb{Z}$ satisfies

\[n < \frac{1}{\log_{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{1}{3}} + \frac{1}{\log_{\frac{1}{5}}\frac{1}{3}} < n+1 ?\]

While this is really just a change in base exercise and then plugging it into a calculator for most people, we can still bound it without a calculator and get the answer. I’ll assume you have gotten to this point,

\[n < \frac{\log{\frac{1}{10}}}{\log{\frac{1}{3}}} < n+1.\]

Set the base equal to $\frac{1}{3}$ to make the bottom part dissapear:

\[n < \log_{\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{1}{10}} <n+1.\]

Past this all you need to know is that $\log_{\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{1}{10}}$ is somewhere between $\log_{\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{1}{9}} =2$ and $\log_{\frac{1}{3}}{\frac{1}{27}} =3$, so $n=2$. We’re done.

Problem 6 Which rational numbers $r$ give the quadratic

\[rx^{2} + (r-2)x+(r+2) = 0\]

two integer roots?

We start by letting the two integer roots be $p,q$. After expanding $(x-p)(x-q)$, we find that

\[x^2 + (-q-p)x +qp = 0.\]

We make the coefficient of the first equation $1$ by dividing it by $r$

\[x^2 + \frac{r-2}{r}x + \frac{r+2}{r} = 0.\]

So we want the coefficents of these two equations to be the same, yeilding

\[-q-p = \frac{r-2}{r} \qquad\qquad qp = \frac{r+2}{r}\]

The key point here is that we can solve both equations for $2$, hopefully removing the constants.

\[(p+q+1)r = 2 \qquad\qquad (qp-1)r = 2.\]

Then finally setting these equal to each other, and dividing $r$, which is indeed possible because $r\neq 0 $:

\[p+q+1 = qp-1.\]

The $p$, $q$ and $qp$ along with the fact that we are finding integer solutions screamed Simon’s favorite factoring trick.

\[\begin{align*} 0 &= qp - p - q - 2 \\ 0 &= (q-1)(p-1)-1-2 \\ 3 & = (q-1)(p-1). \end{align*}\]

The solution is so close… we notice that the only way to get $3$ with integers is $(1,3),(3,1),(-1,-3)(-3,-1)$ (the last few negative ones almost messed me up because I missed them). Also note that the switching the pair does not do anything, as $q$ and $p$ will just swap, which has no affect on our value of $r$.

$p-1$$q-1$
$1$$3$
$-1$$-3$

Solving for $p$, and $q$ (which I will leave as an exercise for the reader), we plug each value back into $ (p+q+1)r = 2 $ from before to get our two values of $r$: $\boxed{-2, \frac{2}{7}}$.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.

Blog Post 02/05/22 - AIME Mock Reflections

Linear Algebra - Playing with Markdown and LaTeX

Comments powered by Disqus.